Thanks for participating in our Oscars 2021 exit survey! In just a few minutes we’re going to open up the results, so you can see what the rest of the Internet had to say. In the meantime, we’ve got an exit survey to send you on your way. The survey’s questions are divided into two categories: 1) personal, and 2) professional. The personal questions are there to get to know you better. The professional questions are there to capture the industry’s reaction, and we’d like to have your input.

Last night, the 91st Academy Awards came to a close. For those of you who haven’t seen it yet, the ceremony was a super-sized, supersized, superspecial superspecial superspecial edition of the Oscar telecast, complete with a superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial supersong, superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial superspecial

A rousing awards series, notable surprises and Glenn Close dancing to Da Batt are just some of the oddities that took place at the 93rd Academy Awards. The Oscars. Soderbergh became a complete Soderbergh and changed the formula of the series when he had the chance. But was it a positive net result, a negative net result, or somewhere in between?

In our 2021 Oscars poll, we list the most memorable moments of the ceremony.

Describe how you found the TV show overall, using an appropriate GIF.

James Lee: I think this GIF tweet from Brian Tallerico sums it up:

Oscars later this year. pic.twitter.com/dL1f1H0O2q

– Brian Tallerico (@Brian_Tallerico) April 26, 2021

K in the cinema:

Jack Edgar:

Brennan Dube:

Richard Keeney:

Nick Kush:

What do you think of the changes Soderberg & Co have made to the ceremony?

James Lee: This year’s show was definitely more informal, but that’s probably because it didn’t take place in such a large venue as the Dolby Theatre – it was almost like the Golden Globes, with the dinner table and a much smaller stage area. I should probably also mention that almost all of the non-US nominees were on screens, standing as journalists in front of cityscapes or sitting in seemingly random places in theater halls, which was, to say the least ….. was interesting to watch.

K in the cinema: I mean, he had the same reaction as the lunatic. Despite a few surprises, I thought I had it well in hand, but then came the last twenty minutes, and they were both confusing and excruciating. At least he’s consistent.

Jack Edgar: A bit like this horse. Regina’s support to start the show was the most compelling in years – it was fresh, exciting and ushered in something new. Everything that followed (apart from the aesthetics) felt stifled and watered down, and I think Soderbergh & Co. were too invested in the individual presenters and winners and their ability to carry an exciting show on their own. The decision to delay the best film award and let the acting awards close the show was a risky one that failed spectacularly. You need to find a better way to present these speeches in a decisive way.

Brennan Dube: In a year that needed to change, I welcomed the change. It was cooler than Zoom’s awards ceremony, and with the reopening of the U.S., it’s completely appropriate for most…… (But never put the best movie anywhere but last…hmmm.)

Richard Keeney: Pretty entertaining for the most part. The change in image selection/composition was extremely abrupt, the winners/representatives no longer spoke onscreen but offscreen, and the frame rate initially seemed to be 24 fps, which felt more like a low-quality short film than a TV show. Notably missing were clips from the nominated films. The total lack of footage for most of the categories made it so monotonous that people who hadn’t seen the films had no idea what was nominated, or on the rare occasion that a film was shown that ruined an important plot point, as in another round in the international feature film category. Overall, it seemed cluttered and awkward.

Nick Kush: I was very excited when the ceremony started with this incredible Ooner with Regina King walking down the hallway of Union Station. It was like a distant cousin of the Ocean movies. Super Soderberghian. But I wish the rest of the TV series found a way to achieve the same dynamic. It’s probably almost impossible when people are sitting at tables, but the rest of the show was pretty tight. Maybe a few more clips and less Laura Dern talking about La Strada would have helped.

What changes to the ceremony would you like to see in the Academy?

James Lee: We pretty much got rid of all the fat – especially the performances of original songs (sorry, I wasn’t a big fan of those in either ceremony) and the constantly random and unfunny jokes from the presenters or, in recent years, the hosts. They got right to the point and as a result the whole ceremony was much livelier.

K in the cinema: While I wish the fantastic sound designers who do much of the dirty work for these films deserved more recognition, I can’t say that sound editing and mixing are separate categories. The sound of metal would win both, and if the voters and public don’t know the difference, that’s the most noticeable change in my opinion.

Jack Edgar: Love the pre-show, love the songs and a great place for outdoor cocktails. It was luxurious and intimate, and I loved watching the stars grow so organically towards each other. Always use Husavik too. All shows. He hits.

Brennan Dube: I enjoyed hearing some of the more intimate and personal stories and fun facts about the nominees. While I didn’t like the way they did it for almost ALL categories, I would have liked it to stay in some form.

Richard Keeney: I hope they will have more time for speeches in the future.

Nick Kush: BANISH THE BEST SONGWRITERS TO HELL!

How do you feel about Anthony Hopkins winning the best actor award over Chadwick Boseman?

James Lee: While it’s disappointing that Boseman didn’t get anything, Hopkins still deserved it – Father was undoubtedly the best career for him – but what I think of the way the award was presented is another story…..

K in the cinema:

Jack Edgar: A well-deserved victory, and I hope history will honor it as one of the greatest achievements in history. It deserves, and doesn’t deserve, to be overshadowed by the production’s decision to force Boseman’s narration to end the show. It would have been better if he had won – and he deserved to – but what a huge miscalculation and frustrating way to end the show. Everyone deserves better.

Brennan Dube: It was a slap in the face, not because Hopkins won. It’s true, both men earned the same amount. Während ich für Boseman zog, kann ich nicht leugnen (als jemand, der Vater liebte), dass Anthony Hopkins nicht nur (vielleicht) die beste Leistung seiner langen Karriere gegeben hat. The frustration is caused by the decision to put him on the last step, a major shortcoming of the manufacturer.

Richard Keeney: In this case, I had no money that I could use, and I was therefore very satisfied with this situation. Boseman was great in Ma Rainey, but I also think Hopkins was great in The Father and totally deserved it. Es gab dem Abend definitiv eine säuerliche Note mit seiner Abwesenheit bzw seinem Nichterscheinen und dem Gefühl, dass sie eindeutig erwarteten, dass Bosman gewinnen würde, um den Abend mit einer Hommage an sein Leben zu beenden.

Nick Kush: If the prices are set correctly, I don’t think this is a great Gesprächstheme. Kein Zweifel, Hopkins’ Sieg war erstaunlich, aber die Änderung der Submission-Reihenfolge hat ihn soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo gemacht.

What should you think about an altered screening, so that the best film comes before the best actor and the best actress?

James Lee: This was the biggest Oscar winner of the past decade, especially after La La Land took the award in the best film category after about a decade. It is very important that Soderbergh and Co. – or wer immer für die Anordnung der Preise verantwortlich war – wirklich glaubten, dass Boseman als Sieger feststand, was sie dazu veranlasste, den Preis für den besten Hauptdarsteller an das Ende zu verschieben, to send him an angemessenen honor, but as we know, that did not happen in the end – Hopkins gewann und die Sendung eindete ohne eine Rede. The end result is definitely unglücklich; not only that Boseman doesn’t get the Anerkennung or Würdigung it deserves, but also Hopkins wahrscheinlich as a generic, stereotypical alter weißer Mann Sieg misunderstood, which, if you’ve seen The Father, is absolutely not the strength of his brilliant, herzzerreißenden Leistung by any conceivable means.

K. im Kino: This was a good thing and everyone was very concerned about it. It had actually been Chloe Zhaos Abend, and I thought it was very impressive that they had received the award for best director in that first session. It looks bad that zum ersten Mal eine farbige Frau und nach dem großen Sieg von Bong Joon Ho, diesen plötzlich von seinem Stammplatz verdrängt. Also, the possibility of exacerbating the outcome, ending the ending, and arranging another disastrous finale was incomprehensible to all concerned.

Jack Edgar: Nein, tut mir leid, tun Sie das nicht noch einmal. Dadurch wurde ein großer, klimatischer Nomadland-Moment im Dienste einer Erzählung untergraben, die fehlschlug (und über die sie keine Kontrolle hatten). If we have heard anything on the day, those results will surprise anyone.

Brennan Dube: It was a clever trick and a joke by the manufacturer, which was clearly not a success. Interessanterweise bedeutet dies jedoch, dass niemand weiß, wer diese Preise gewinnen wird, bis die Karte gelesen wird.

Richard Keeney: Der Besetzungswechsel am Ende war ein Risiko, das sich eindeutig nicht auszahlte und das Ende extrem nervös und antiklimaktisch machte.

Nick Kush: Soderbergh geht zu Soderbergh. The experiments are purely experimental, and the experiments are often bizarre. In theory, this step is appropriate: The best film has been certain for months, but even Chadwick Boseman can’t free himself for an emotive wind and trot. But if one then noch hinzufügt, dat Hopkins in den letzten Wochen deutlich an Schwung gewonnen hat und Joaquin Phoenix unglaublich unbeholfen ist, bekommt man Eier im Gesicht. Hopkins has fully earned the description, but this category classification does not have more room for possible interferences.

Hopkins v Boseman, what is the biggest Überraschungssieg of the weekend for you?

James Lee: Eric Messerschmidt wins the award for best camera work for Munk. I honestly thought Joshua James Richards and his stunning, stunning Malickian camerawork was the clear favorite for Nomadland, but I suspect the Oscars leaned more towards a well-made copy of the 1930s black and white Hollywood aesthetic, which I don’t mind. If it’s not Richards, it’s Messerschmidt, and both have certainly delivered some of the best films of the past year.

K in the cinema: While I think Munk’s victory in photography or Glenn Close’s Da Butte moment are acceptable responses, I would argue that it was the Chicago 7 process that was interrupted. While I personally thought it was a likable film, of the sort that was nominated a few weeks ago, having not seen it, I was surprised by the traction it got in the late Oscar predictions. I’m surprised the movie didn’t win anything.

Jack Edgar: Outside of Glenn Close and her cubicle, you have to go with Mank (Cinematography). I thought Nomadland would probably fall into this category, but what a treat to see such a technically excellent film take some awards on Sunday. Dude!

Brennan Dube: I knew she was still in the running for the award, but seeing Frances McDormand on stage to win Best Actress after she had been screaming to win Best Picture was an interesting surprise. I have to say, though, that this solves my OCD about Nomadland only being able to have the film and the director (which would be such a weird BP package).

Richard Keeney: I was pleasantly surprised by Frances McDormand’s win, but it was also one of the least predictable categories of the night.

Nick Kush: I was one of five people who saw all the shorts, and I didn’t see Colette win.

Given the hustle and bustle of this awards season (and life in general), how do you think we’ll remember this year’s show, nominees and winners?

James Lee: If the 2017 awards show was any indication, it will be most remembered for the Best Lead Actor fiasco. Neither Chloe Zhao won the historic Best Director award, nor delightful Best Supporting Actress Yun Yuzhong, nor Glenn Close’s enthusiastic (drunk? What was wrong with her?) account of Da Batt’s story, nothing more – no fiasco for Best Lead Actor to begin with. And honestly, it’s kind of a shame because it was a really good year.

К. In the movies: All in all, I think this year’s Oscars will be quickly forgotten, to be honest. Nonetheless, I think it will be a great year, showcasing a number of different and interesting people in the industry. I don’t think this will be the last we hear of Chloe Zhao, Emerald Fennell, Daniel Kaluuya, Riz Ahmed and Octopus. I can’t wait to see how their careers develop with the extra attention and/or prestige the show has brought them this year.

Jack Edgar: The human films have won. The richness extends to some truly beautiful and fascinating films, each telling a different story that expands our understanding of life and humanity. Yoon Yu-jung melted us, Anthony Hopkins devastated us, Emerald Fennell provoked us, and Nomad shared his heart with us. It was a great year for film, and I don’t see an asterisk there anymore.

Brennan Dube: People will be sensitive to star power during awards season. And while I agree that the general public wasn’t as receptive to it as they have been in recent years, one can’t discount the incredible quality of these films. Whether it was Chloe Zhao’s historic win or the amazing McDormand-Hopkins-Kaluuya-Jung cast, I think there was enough quality here to make this season memorable.

Richard Keeney: Despite the nomination of some great films, I think this year’s Oscars will be rather forgettable, aside from the format change and the circumstances surrounding it. It can be remembered that Kaluuya remembered how his parents conceived him.

Nick Kush: As someone who is almost always pessimistic when it comes to the Oscars, I had a good feeling about the nominees. In my opinion, seven of the eight Best Picture nominees were pretty excellent (just get the Chicago 7 process out of my face). I hope we will continue to remember these films as fascinating achievements. As far as talking points go, I have a lot more to say about this round of nominees than in previous years. They are so interesting and definitely handmade.

But if I can just admit my pessimism, I think there’s a growing gap between the average person who sees a few movies a year and the average person who uses Twitter regularly. Viewership has never been so low, and the only reason the Academy has any value is so that it can introduce many people to filmmakers like Bong Joon-ho, Barry Jenkins and other big names who may not be of interest to the general public. While these nominees were widely available for streaming, the conversation around them was quite limited. I doubt this ceremony carries much weight in the general culture, but I hope I’m wrong.

Follow @MovieBabble_ on Twitter

Thanks for reading! What do you think of the 2021 Oscars? Comment below!

If you enjoyed this article, please sign up by email to stay informed.

Join Patreon to ensure new content is always available.

Dim:

How do you load…

This source has been very much helpful in doing our research. Read more about academy award winning movies 2020 and let us know what you think.

Frequently Asked Questions

What will happen to Oscars 2021?

With the Academy Awards just a year away, it seems natural to wonder what the ceremony might bring. But while the media is always focused on who will win the coveted “Best Actor” and “Best Actress” awards, few people seem to care about who will win the less flashy “Best Cinematography” and “Best Documentary Feature” awards. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, or simply the Academy, has been responsible for handing out the Academy Awards since 1929. They are probably better known as the Oscars. The idea behind Academy Award winners is that only the best movies and actors and actresses get rewarded. However, trends in movie-making have been changing over the last decades, and the Academy is having to change along with them. What will the Academy’s role in the movie industry be in 2021?

Will the 2021 Oscars be Cancelled?

The annual Academy Awards ceremony is a source of amusement for many and a source of contention for a few, but it’s unlikely that anyone is more interested than the Academy itself. As the Oscars approach, the Academy must make the call on whether or not to cancel the 2021 show entirely. Though only a few years out, the ability to book first-rate talent for a show this far in advance is no small feat, and the decision to cancel would come with a hefty price tag. The Academy has no clear consensus on whether or not to cancel the Oscars in 2021. As we move into the latter part of the decade, the Academy Awards are becoming more and more controversial. Some of Hollywood’s brightest stars are voicing their concerns about the lack of diversity amongst the nominees. In fact, some are calling for the Academy to completely eliminate the awards ceremony. Will this happen? It’s hard to say. What we do know is that the Academy has had a history of being racist and sexist. It wasn’t until the 70’s that the Oscars were held at a non-segregated location. In the 2010’s, the Academy has come under fire for not giving credit to minorities, even when they are nominated for major awards. After all, it is hard to ignore the fact that the Academy has no African Americans on

Who won an Oscar 2021?

Ten years from now, the winners of this year’s Oscars will be revealed. But who will it be? The prestigious awards ceremony has a long history of giving recognition to brilliant, courageous, and important films that might not have won without the Academy’s help. Here’s our take on what the winners might be in the year 2021… So who had their names called (or what movies won) at the Academy Awards? As usual, there were a few surprises at this year’s ceremony. But what we really want to know is: who won the most Oscars in 2021?

academy award winners 2021oscars 2021 nominations announcementacademy awardsoscar winners 2020academy award winning movies 202093rd academy awards,People also search for,Feedback,Privacy settings,How Search works,93rd Academy Awards,Award ceremony,Academy Awards,Nomadland,Minari,Mank,Two Distant Strangers,The Father,Judas and the Black Messiah,See more,academy award winners 2021,oscars 2021 nominations announcement,oscar winners 2020,academy award winning movies 2020,93rd academy awards,oscar winners best picture,oscars 2021 cancelled

You May Also Like

Royal Family News: Prince Harry Has Already Lost His Honorary Military Titles?

The British royal family reports that there may be a fight between…

Royal Family Expert Reveals If Queen Elizabeth Values Monarchy Or Prince Harry More!

There’s no doubt that the royal family has a very important place…

“No Other Sons or Daughters”

If one were to see Deadwood only for the great drama No…

Monsters, Inc. (2001) Movie Summary and Film Synopsis on MHM

Film and Action Synopsis James P. Sully Sullivan and Michael Mike Wazowski…